Search The Doctor's Report

Thursday, 28 June 2012

Africa Needs a Mental Revolution; Not Aid

Patrice Lumumba, the first legally elected Prime Minister of the Congolese Republic, underlined the urgent need for a mental revolution to be created throughout Africa. This is why the CIA sponsored a plot to kill him 50 years.
"The liberation of the minds of the African people will be a tougher battle than the eradication of settler regimes". -Patrice Lumumba.
These words of Patrice Lumumba, clearly underscores the urgent need for institutions to be created throughout Africa, with the sole responsibility to liberate the minds of the African people. It is for this reason that the Project Pan-Africa (PPA), a Pan-African initiative that seeks to create a "mental revolution" throughout the continent and strive for a better Africa, is currently underway. Fortunately, a few African institutions have shown their desire to support this initiative. This is desirable because we seriously need a change of mentality to free ourselves from colonial bondage.
One major challenge that currently faces the African people is not that of poverty. Neither is it the lack of resources. In the 21st century, the major problem we face as a people is what Bob Marley has referred to as "Mental Slavery". Bob Marley acknowledged that “none but ourselves can free our minds”.
We have all the resources here in Africa. In fact it is estimated that Africa possesses more than 60% of the world's natural resources. Yet, Africans are brainwashed to believe they are poor. Our economies have been held hostage by imperial dictatorships. Prices are pre-determined for our natural resources neither on the basis of their value nor their quality. Rather, they’re designed to enrich the foreign capitalist’s interest. Africa's resources are been looted on a mass scale under the guise of ‘investment’ and ‘economic aid’. We accept this fate because we’re told we have no knowledge of how to explore these resources by ourselves.
“It is often said that the foreign ‘investor’ however self-interested he might be, would still be ‘doing Africa a favour’. This sort of argument reminds me of the man who, having found plenty of buried treasures in his neighbour’s garden, took it away and then told his neighbour that he was doing him no harm, because, until then, this fellow was unaware of the existence of such valuable resource”. –Kwame Nkrumah (Africa must Unite, page 20).
Instead of African leaders to unite and demand a fair price for the vast resources we have to benefit the ordinary African, we individually beg for aid and they take our resources barely for free. Africa needs fair trade; not economic aid with unfair conditions attached. The great millions of Africans are growing impatient of being the hewers of wood, the providers of unskilled labour, the drawers of water, as well as being the cleaners of Europe and America. What Africa currently needs are leaders who believe in Pan-Africanism. For it is because of Pan-Africanism we attained independence from colonial rule. We need leaders who will see the benefits that come with our determination to stand together, struggle together, grow together and unite in order to fight against imperial dictatorship and Western exploitation. Just imagine how the entire African leaders were ignored by the US, Britain and France who imposed their wish upon Libya, murdered Gaddafi with impunity and threw the country into chaos. Even though the UN Resolution 1973 on Libya was abused, you can be certain that the ICC: the International Court of Criminals will never find anybody in NATO to be guilty of war crimes nor crimes against humanity. As of now, even though many evidences have found Bush and Blair to be guilty of crimes against humanity, the ICC still remains blind to these evidences. It is always African leaders whose crimes are seen by the international community. It is time for Africans to establish their own judicial systems to deal with crimes committed by Africans. The current imperial systems have outlived their usefulness; they have been corrupted and are now tools that serve Western interest but do not serve international justice.
When Kofi Anan became the UN sec Gen, Africa was full of hope. When El Baradie headed the IAEA, Africa was full of hope. When Obama won the elections in America, Africa was full of Hope. A Gambian to head the ICC, Africa started Hoping. When Okonjo became the World Bank MD, Africa hoped and hoped. The new hope is that when African woman becomes the world Bank President, Africa will be better. My humble advice to all Africans is to end this illusive dream and take a cue from India, China, Brazil, Singapore, Malaysia, and South Korea by putting their hopes only in themselves and working hard to develop their countries. Africans must stop putting hope in western puppets!! We must create our own institutions to deal with our own problems. This form of imported justice and imported policies must stop.
 How Long Can We Cope With Apathy?
Thousands of weapons were poured into Africa by France and Qatar, ignoring all international laws. When two Western journalists died in Syria, the whole western world was outraged. Yet, in Libya, many blacks majority of them Nigerians were brutally murdered by NATO's rebels under the watch of the UN, while the West cheered and jubilated, calling it a success. No one pointed out that indeed what happened to the Gaddafis was not death by accident but a premeditated murder. This had already been discussed in the Western media, with Hillary Clinton herself calling on the Al-Qaeda rebels to “capture or kill” Gaddafi.
Yet, there was not a single word from those who declare themselves as ‘world leaders’, human right institutions nor the international “courts of justice”, condemning  Hillary Clinton’s remarks and the killing of blacks in Libya. After all, the fall of Gaddafi and the oil contracts were all they sought after; not the security of Africans.
Shockingly, the African leaders, many of them Doctors and Professors, averagely beyond the age of 70yrs, were simply relegated to the status of “children”, whose views were side-lined by NATO as irrelevant.  This could only happen because there is no unity among our African leaders and as such they couldn't have been taken serious. Most importantly, the strong ones in their midst have been tainted by corruption to the point where their voices cannot be heard on such important developments for the fear of putting themselves in the spotlight. The challenges facing our individual countries are getting out of control. It is only with a concerted effort that we can contain these problems. It must be understood that no single African state can stand against the wrath of imperialism, without needing the protection/support of the entire continent.
In his book Africa Must Unite (page xvi), Kwame Nkrumah wrote:
“Imperialism is still a most powerful force to be reckoned with in Africa. It operates on a world-wide scale in combinations of many different kinds: economic, political, cultural, educational, military; and through intelligence (covert operations) and information services. …Just as our strength lies in a unified policy and action for progress and development, so the strength of the imperialists lies in our disunity. We in Africa can only meet them effectively by presenting a unified front and a continental purpose”.
Unfortunately, African leaders of today, many of them intellectuals still pretend as if they are never familiar with these words of our founding fathers. What happened in Libya and Ivory Coast clearly confirms the urgent need for African leaders to unite and be able to defend the interest of the African people. Africa needs leaders who see the need to work together bearing in mind the interest of all Africans, but not merely to seek their selfish interests nor that of their individual countries.

©PPA: a project to create a mental revolution across Africa
When commissioned, the PPA's major objective will focus upon unlocking African minds for the freedom of the African people as a whole. Our problems can be surmounted not merely by individual efforts but by a collective action with a common objective. Therefore the minds of the African youth must be empowered to take the future of our beloved continent from the hands of the current batch of leaders who continue to stab one another in the back for their own selfish gains. Some of them have blindly taken the imperial powers on trust, falsely believing that their selfish ambitions will be protected forever. They don’t seem to understand that imperialism has a permanent interest but no permanent friends/servants. Most of them fail to understand that the forces dictating to them are actually manipulating them against one another.
Security, Our Collective Responsibility
Nkrumah held that, no single part of Africa can be safe, or free to develop fully and independently at a time when any other part is torn up in conflict; remains unliberated or under the control of puppet regimes. Africans must be able to picture the continent as one human body. All the “states” together form the “organs” and the “systems” that must work together to make the body complete. No single part of Africa can succeed in isolation. Like the human body, any problem at any part of the body affects the entire body altogether.  This is why problems in Sudan should not be seen merely as a problem for the Sudanese, but as an African problem which must be tackled by our collective efforts. The problems in Nigeria should not be seen as Nigeria's responsibility alone but something that requires our collective input. Many of such problems can never be solved by the state in question alone.
Meanwhile there is also the danger of such problems spilling over to other neighbouring states if not properly contained. Today, the conflict in Libya which many African nations pretended they did not know about has had serious repercussions, with many of the weapons making their way to various corners of the continents. All the anti-aircraft missiles which landed in the hands of the rebels/terrorists currently pose a great danger not only to the Libyan people but to any African country where commercial airlines fly. It is the same with Somalia, Uganda, Nigeria, Ivory Coast and others. The problem of any single African state has to be tackled by our collective efforts as our problem. This lackadaisical attitude where certain African leaders behave as if they can leave in isolation, when their neighbour’s borders are in flames is unfortunate. It has been said that Africans must unite, for they have nothing to lose but their chains. The time is right for us to unite and fight for our freedom. For freedom is not given by consent but as a result of determination to attain it.
Freedom is not a commodity which is ‘given’ to the enslaved upon demand. It is a precious reward, the shining trophy of struggle and sacrifice”, -Kwame Nkrumah.
African leaders need to establish a joint security force whose major responsibility will be to defend the African people from terrorism and foreign aggression.
On the security front, Kwame Nkrumah thus wrote:
“Unless we meet this obvious and very powerful threat with a unified African front, based upon a common economic and defence policy, the strategy of the imperialist will be to pick us off and destroy us one by one” (Africa Must Unite, page xvii).
We in Africa do NOT need NATO. We rather need unity. We do not need AFRICOM. At the same time, no NATO country, will accept African troops on her soil. The US will never allow any foreign troops on her soil. Therefore why must Africa be the testing ground for NATOs 21st century missiles? We already know the track records of NATO in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Pakistan, Libya and other places. Apart from the huge untold deaths of millions of civilians which but for WikiLeaks, had always escaped the headlines, the effect of the depleted uranium bombs and the WMDs used in these countries has resulted in many babies born with disabilities and untold consequences of cancer. Africa must not allow our motherland to become the new ‘Middle East’. We must be ready to take the future of our continent into our own hands. Time is running out for Africa to unite. We will have nothing to lose but our chains!
"Divided we are weak; united, Africa could become one of the greatest forces for good in the world". -Kwame Nkrumah (I speak of Freedom).
Kwame Nkrumah (1963) “Africa Must Unite”, Panaf Books: London
Project Pan-Africa,
Honourable Saka
The author is a regular writer and a political analyst on African affairs, and a well-known social commentator in Africa. Hes is currently seeking the establishment of the "Project Pan-Africa" to create a mental revolution across Africa. He is the editor of “The Doctor’s Report”, your most reliable source of critical analysis on African affairs. He is a strong Pan-Africanist, a youth activist and the founder of the “Leaders of Tomorrow”, a transformational and inspirational group of possible future leaders. Please visit his blog at: and Email him at:

Sunday, 24 June 2012

Boko Haram: A CIA Covert Operation


               By ILIYASU GADU 


In the aftermath of the unfortunate bombings and sporadic attacks that took place in Damaturu the Yobe State capital and environs on the last Sallah Day, the Embassy of the United States in Nigeria hastily put out a public statement declaring that such like bombings should be expected in three well known hospitality establishments in Abuja the nation’s capital.

To discerning observers not only did that score high marks for bad manners as that was hardly what a nation still grieving and coming to terms with its losses expected from a supposedly friendly nation, but that the US embassy was being economical with information on what it actually knew about the incident, and more significantly, the role the US government itself has been playing in the whole gamut of acts of destabilization against Nigeria.

We have already been regaled with reports provided by the Wikileaks which identified the US embassy in Nigeria as a forward operating base for wide and far reaching acts of subversion against Nigeria which include but not limited to eavesdropping on Nigerian government communication, financial espionage on leading Nigerians, support and funding of subversive groups and insurgents, sponsoring of divisive propaganda among the disparate groups of Nigeria and the use of visa blackmail to induce and coerce high ranking Nigerians into acting in favour of US interests.
But beyond what we know from the Wikileaks report, what many Nigerians do not know is that US embassy’s subversive activities in Nigeria fits into the long term US government’s well camouflaged policy of containment against Nigeria the ultimate goal of which is to eliminate Nigeria as a potential strategic rival to the US in the African continent.

Today as Nigerians are reeling from the negative effects of the insurgency that has befallen our dear country and earnestly seeking answers to what all this portends for the future, the GREENWHITE COALITION a citizen’s watchdog can reveal the true nature of this silent, undeclared war of attrition waged against Nigeria by the Government of United States of America.


ACRI stands for Africa Crises Response Initiative and it was set up during the Bush Jnr Administration as a counterweight to the Nigeria led ECOWAS Monitoring Group on the Liberian Civil War or ECOMOG as it is more popularly known.
ACRI came to being from the secret reports and recommendations separately by the Africa-America Institute and the Brooklyn Institute commissioned by the Central Intelligence Agency, the American Government’s Directorate responsible for organizing foreign subversive activities, on the Liberian civil war and the intervention of ECOMOG.
Both reports zeroed in on the pivotal role Nigeria was playing in the ECOMOG initiative and noted pointedly the phenomenal success recorded by ECOMOG in containing the Liberian crisis without any significant role or intervention from any of the major western powers including the United States.

The report concluded that should ECOMOG be allowed to go the whole hog, the major beneficiary will be Nigeria and that might form the basis for a pax Nigeriana in the West African sub-region eclipsing the influence of former colonial powers France and Britain.
The reports also called on the United States Government to note that Liberia being its creation should not be allowed to fall into Nigerian hands with consequences to US strategic interests in the country and the region. Specifically both reports noted that should Nigeria be allowed to have a foothold in Liberia, it will further embolden Nigeria to challenge the US and the West in carving its own sphere of interest at their expense.

In this regard, the report further recalled Nigeria’s role in helping to liberate the southern African countries in the 70’s and 80’s in clear opposition and defiance to the interests of the United States and its western allies which resulted in setback for Western initiatives in Africa at the time.
Both concluded with a recommendation that the US Government in conjunction with its allies should seek to contain the growing influence of Nigeria in the sub-region by forming a parallel organization to ECOMOG. But in order not to unduly alarm and antagonize Nigeria which the report admitted still had considerable influence in the region, the US government was advised to go about this using quiet diplomacy.
On the diplomatic front, the US along with its allies namely Britain and France using the engineered stalemate as cover, proceeded to sell the idea that the ECOMOG initiative needed to be reviewed and given a new direction.
By the time the tallies were counted, the US had achieved the one objective of all the diplomatic and strategic maneuvers; the containment of Nigeria led ECOMOG initiative to resolve the Liberian Crises.
It was on the platform of this surreptitious American intervention in the Liberian crisis that the US Africa Command or AFRICOM was formed.

Unlike its precursor, the ACRI which sought to disguise US intentions in Africa particularly as it pertains to Nigeria under the cloak of multilateral humanitarian intervention, AFRICOM which came to being on October 1, 2008 is clearly programmed to serve US military-strategic interests especially with regards to the ever expanding global reach and influence of China in direct competition with the United States.
In response to the growing influence of a rapidly expanding industrial China in Africa, the goal of AFRICOM is to seize key strategic areas in Africa and bring them under US control in order to block China’s access to vital energy and mineral resources for its expanding economy. But to effectively carry this out, such African countries of strategic importance must first of all be weakened internally and made to feel so vulnerable that they would have to inevitably seek US protection or intervention. A spur to this interventionist programme provides that any targeted African country that does not see the wisdom or resists the need to seek US “protection” will then have to suffer dismemberment with the pliant area carved out of the supposedly hostile area and given US “protection”.

We have seen this happen in the great lakes area where US Special Forces have been deployed ostensibly to protect the countries there from so-called insurgents who in the first place were sponsored by the same US. In Sudan we have seen how a blanket cover of international humanitarian cries orchestrated by the United States on the so-called Darfur crisis served as a prelude to the dismemberment of Sudan to punish the government of El-Bashir for daring to conclude oil deals with the Chinese to the detriment of American companies.

We have also seen how Libya and Gaddafi was put to the sword for daring to sidetrack American oil interests. But the greatest prize for AFRICOM and its goal to plant a PAX AMERICANA in Africa would be when it succeeds in the most strategic African country, NIGERIA. This is where the raging issue of BOKO HARAM and the widely reported prediction by the United States Intelligence Council on the disintegration of Nigeria by 2015 comes into perspective.


From the 1st October 2010 bombing that rocked Abuja till date Nigeria seems to be locked in a vice like grip of a growing and intractable insurgency manifested in bombings of public places and sporadic attacks on public institutions resulting in the loss of scores of lives and destruction of properties. Predictably there has been a discernible growth in panic and tension in the country and not a few people are beginning to think that perhaps the country seems headed inevitably for a long drawn insurgency leading to a split. With the exception of the 1st October 2010 bombing incident, a shadowy group which goes by the name Boko Haram has laid claim to most of the subsequent bombings that have occurred in the country.

The seemingly intractable nature of the Boko Haram outrage has prompted a lot of questions from Nigerians. What really is this Boko Haram thing and what are their grievances if any? Why have they chosen to remain faceless in spite of the devastating effects of their activities on the psyche of the nation, and entreaties from Nigerian authorities to come forward for negotiations? Why are they able to perpetrate their attacks with relative ease and why has there not been a single clue at the scene of their acts to lead to them?

For sure, Nigerians are not unused to sectarian violence.  But the ones we have witnessed in this country have been predictable and the modus and fault lines have been well known to the authorities who have always done well to keep them within tolerable limits.
The Boko Haram of Mohammed Yussuf which predated this new one can be so categorized and was well known through its operations, leadership and locations.

But how did a ragtag collection of largely half literate unsophisticated persons operating mostly on Okada transform literarily overnight to being able to design, manufacture and deploy bombs in buildings and in vehicles costing in excess of a million naira and carry out attacks in several locations around the country?
How have their reach grown from just a corner of Nigeria to virtually everywhere in the country? For them to be able to mount such a sophisticated operation, they must necessarily have a well structured command and control system which in spite of their best efforts at concealment cannot remain undetected for long. So how have they seemingly defied the best efforts of combined security agencies in the country in detecting and foiling their activities?
The GREENWHITE Coalition can reveal that the current Boko Haram campaign is a covert operation organized by the American Central Intelligence Agency, CIA and coordinated by the American Embassy in Nigeria.
For some time now, the CIA has been running secret training and indoctrination camps along the porous and vulnerable borderlands of Niger, Chad and Cameroon. At these camps youths from poor, deprived and disoriented backgrounds are recruited and trained to serve as insurgents. The agents who supply these youth lure them with the promise of better life and work of Allah and further indoctrinated to believe they are working to install a just Islamic order from the ungodly one that currently holds sway in Nigeria.

The American CIA programme officers of this project prudently remain in the background, living the day to day running of the camps to supervisors of Middle Eastern origin specially recruited for this purpose. After several months of indoctrination and training on weapons handling, survival tactics, surveillance and evasion techniques, the insurgents are now put on stand by for the next phase of the operation.
The next phase of the operations involves the identification and selection of the targets which had already been mapped out by the American Embassy. If buildings are the targets for attack, the weapons and technical equipment to be used are kept in safe houses.

The countdown to the attack involves ferrying of the insurgents and quarantine at safe houses for the H hour. After the attack, in the ensuing panic, the insurgents make their escape into safe houses to dispose the weapons and disappear and dissolve later into the local population. The technical angle of sending out e-mails and messages of responsibility for the attack to the media in the name of Boko Haram is done through secure telecoms equipment by the American programmers of the operation which can hardly be traced.
If the selected target is to be bombed by an IED, the building is cased for days and the devise inserted when security is lax. The devise is then detonated by an in-built timing mechanism or by a hand held detonator some distance away from where the bomb is placed. If on the hand, the attack is to be carried out by a suicide bomber, the person to carry it out would have been severely drugged with CIA manufactured LSD to disorientation. In his state of mind he would have no clue as to what he is programmed to do having been turned into a veritable human robot.


It is neither a coincidence nor guesswork that the National Intelligence Council of the United States Government estimated that Nigeria will disintegrate by the year 2015. The whole report actually is a coded statement of intentions on how using destabilization plots the US plans to eventually dismember Nigeria.
The whole goal of the destabilization campaign is to ensure that Nigeria is weakened internally by intractable crises leading up to 2015 when the next general elections are expected to come up. By that year there will be so much mutual suspicion among Nigerians that the elections itself might not hold or if they did at all will set the stage for a full rapture of the Nigerian state. By its calculation and design, the Nigerian state will be so fractious by then; it will be fully ripe for intervention and break up. It is in actualization of this plan that the US strategic planners on Nigeria have devised a three stage plan of implementation.

Stage 1: Pakistanizing Nigeria
With the scourge of Boko Haram as an existential reality, in the coming months the spate of bombings and attacks on public buildings are likely to escalate. High value symbolic targets like churches, mosques and large congregations of people of both faiths will be targeted.
There will also be escalation in provocative statements and incitements by groups to violence. For good measure and effect, the bombings and attacks will be staged on days of observance of religious activities.
The goal is to exacerbate tension and mutual suspicion among adherents of the two faiths in Nigeria and leading to sectarian violence.
This pattern of destabilization operation is taken out of the Pakistani manual of destabilization where a sustained spate of CIA sponsored bombings and sectarian violence stretched the ability and resources of the law and order agencies to cope rendering the country weak and vulnerable to foreign intervention.

Stage 2: Internationalizing the Crisis
Having the set the stage for an intractable sectarian violence pitting Christians against Muslims and between the various disparate groups in the country, there will be calls from the United States, European Union and United Nations for a halt to the violence. A plethora of advocacy groups around the world will struggle for the photo opportunity to mouth concerns about the carnage and humanitarian catastrophe. They will try to make a great show of providing humanitarian aid. For effect, there will be carpet bombing coverage by the International media on the Nigerian crisis with so-called experts discussing all the ramifications who will strive to create the impression that only benevolent foreign intervention could resolve the crisis.
There will be a deluge of international conferences at various capitals around the world all ostensibly aimed to save Nigerians from themselves. Meanwhile away from all the public flurry of activities, the US which initiated the crisis in the first place will be secretly drawing up plans to carve out Nigeria for its strategic and economic benefits.

Stage 3: the Great Carve out under UN Mandate
Following worldwide outrage at the scale of carnage resulting from all out war among various sections of Nigeria secretly induced by the United States and its allies, the stage will now shift to the United Nations where debates will take place on how the world body will work to resolve the crisis.
There will be proposals first for an international peace keeping force to intervene and separate the warring groups and or for a UN mandate for various parts of Nigeria to come under mandated occupying powers. Of course behind the scenes the US and its allies would have secretly worked out which areas of Nigeria to occupy guided as it were by naked economic interests.
It is trite really which power or powers eventually occupies Nigeria for whatever reasons. By the time the UN comes to take a decision to hand over Nigeria for occupation under its mandate, no part of Nigeria will emerge or profit truly from the exercise. The rump areas of Nigeria will all come under occupation and puppet governments will then be set up at the behest of the occupying powers. Nigeria’s fall will be like that of humpty-dumpty, into pieces beyond recognition.
The main beneficiary will of course be the United States which started all this in the first place and which will be there to profit at the end. By engineering the break up of Nigeria, the United States would have eliminated a potential continental rival paving the way to the institution of a Pax Americana in Africa and secondly it would have limited its main global strategic rival China from direct access to badly needed energy and other mineral resources on the resource rich African continent.


Related News Media
Against this background Nigerians need to stop and ask critical questions; what real purpose does it serve to deliberately leak a supposedly classified report from a US Intelligence organ normally restricted to only a handful of US policy makers only, to the media and for good measure ensure its wide circulation in the country against whom the action is targeted? Does that not indicate a statement of intent by the country that originated the report to serve as psychological intimidation for the purpose of softening up the targeted country making it ripe for intervention?
In any routine investigation of an act, investigators usually call in the statements of material witnesses before or after the act whether deliberately uttered or inadvertently; does the statement by the United States National Intelligence Council on the break up of Nigeria in 2015 not amount to culpability in this regard especially in view of the escalation in the seemingly intractable acts of subversive violence taking place in Nigeria after that statement was released and also in view of US antecedents in matters such as this around the world?
Why is it that a country which has always been known for its resilience and ability to resolve its problems without outside interference? Is this not indicative of the very Nigerian saying that the witch cried in the night and the child died in the morning?
Why is someone somewhere hell bent on engineering Nigerians to form the unNigerian habit of harbouring and perpetrating desperate, extreme and unforgiving actions against themselves?
Should we all 160million of us stand idly by and allow the United States achieve its selfish and diabolical aim of sowing discord in our country leaving us with widows, orphans and humanitarian problems as it has done in other places? Are we going to allow the labour of our heroes past which bequeathed us a nation second to none and reputed to be the backbone of Africa to die in vain?
From Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan and Latin America, America’s track record around the world has been nothing but ugly. In the words of its own statesmen, America has no permanent friends but permanents interests which translate into a healthy and utter disregard to the sensitivities and interests of other countries. That has pretty much formed the basis of US interaction around the world. The same situation will play itself out if we allow them in to our country.
Nigerians let us stop and think before we allow the big bad wolf in, for we will have nobody but ourselves to blame when our chickens start to get missing.


He is one of America’s top Foreign Service officers and in the parlance of the State Department, an “old Africa hand”. Do you know that Terence P. McCulley, the current United States Ambassador to Nigeria was one of the architects of the Africa Crisis Response Initiative, ACRI which sought to undermine Nigeria’s involvement in ECOMOG?
Do you also know that he was also among the prominent resource persons that worked on establishing AFRICOM?
Do you also know that Ambassador McCulley’s alternate designation is State Department Coordinator of the AFRICOM from which position he is to diplomatically sell and smoothen the way for the entry of AFRICOM into Nigeria?
Do you know too that his main brief as Ambassador to Nigeria is to coordinate activities of the United States Government using the convenient cover of the Embassy of the United States in Nigeria?
Do you also know that the full classified report by the United States National Intelligence Council on the possible break up of Nigeria which parts were only selectively released contains details of how the US plans to carry out this desired end?

The full details of the bombing of the UN Building in Abuja; who did it and how it was done.
You might also need to know real mission of the so-called foreign security experts who came to “investigate” the bombing. Did they really come to investigate the incident and provide the details of their actual findings to Nigerian authorities or their real brief was mop up any stray evidence from the bombing site in order to obscure the involvement of those who sponsored the act?
The US Embassy in Nigeria operates a network of so-called safe houses all over Nigeria from where it runs various subversive operations including electronic intelligence, surveillance, planning and carrying out of covert operations in Nigeria.
We will provide details of the locations and addresses of such safe houses in Nigeria in the next GREENWHITE COALITION Report.

The GREENWHITE COALITION as the name implies, is inspired from the colours of the Nigerian flag and has set out to rally Nigerians to the flag in defence of the greater interest of the Nigerian nation in the face of plans by the United States to destroy our country and our future. It is a citizen’s volunteer watchdog made up of Nigerians of all ethnic groups and religious persuasions who are alarmed at the dark plans of the United States of America to break up our dear country. We have taken it upon ourselves to spare no effort to expose and thwart the United States Government from carrying out its diabolical plans in Nigeria. For this we are dedicated to ferreting out information and plan counter actions against any untoward moves by the United States Government in Nigeria. In this endeavour we are fortunate to count on the support of well placed functionaries of the United States Government and other highly informed sympathizers who supply us with valuable inside information on the intentions of the United States Government as it affects Nigeria. These persons are themselves alarmed and appalled by the fact that the Government machinery of the United States has been hijacked by rogue elements denying the vast majority of American citizens their fundamental constitutional rights as envisaged by the founding fathers of America. Needless to say that these persons among who are those who served America diligently are aghast at the foreign policy of the American government which purports to act in protection of the American people but in reality protects the corrupt corporate elements that have taken America and Americans hostage.

In the coming days and months the GREENWHITE COALITION will manifest in many ways legally in the Nigerian public domain in its efforts to prevent our country from coming under the American boot. This write up is the first in the series. Many more will come with pinpoint expose of the American Government plans against Nigeria. The United States Government is hereby put on notice; we will not allow our women to be turned to widows and our children orphans as in Iraq, and elsewhere. We will not be turned to refugees at the mercy of so-called humanitarian charities. Nigeria must take its place under the sun.

On behalf of the GREENWHITE COALITION; -igbofocus

Saturday, 16 June 2012

London Olympics: Rockefeller Sees 13,000 Already Dead; BBC Says Over 100,000

Rockefeller's foundation could see 13,000 dead at the Londom Olympics even before the games begun
 "All we need is the right major crises and the nations will accept the  New World Order".
-David Rockeffeler

By Honourable Saka
Rockefeller's Dooms Decade: Who Are The Victims?
For many months, the security situation at the London Olympics became an issue of great concern to the British people, the government and the international community as a whole. Many anticipate that terrorists’ attack could mar the beauty of the entire game and put the security of tens of thousands of people at risk. As a result, unprecedented military expenditure has already been exhausted as billions of the taxpayer’s money has been spent on security arrangements that aim to prevent any such incidence. The initial budget has thus multiplied in ten folds!
In an article written by Dave Zirin, he states:
“Londoners were first told that the Olympics would cost £2.4 billion. Projections that include ballooning infrastructure costs are now looking at £24 billion, ten times the original bid’s estimate". Last year, the Guardian reported that there are 1.85 million CCTVs cameras across Britain, closely monitoring every movement at every corner. In the Article: “Three places to avoid this summer: Kabul, Baghdad and the 2012 London Olympics”, Simon Jenkins, writing for the Guardian, paints the picture of some breath-taking developments around the friendly Olympics games.
A week-long "military exercise" is currently under way in the capital. RAF Typhoon jets are to scream back and forth over the Thames. Starstreak surface-to-air missile batteries are being set up in East End parks and on flats in Bow, with 10 soldiers manning each one. Army and navy helicopters will clatter back and forth, with snipers hanging from their doors "to shoot down pilots of terrorist planes... Yet, not one defence spokesman has come up with a plausible scenario for the jets and missiles.
Was this an indication that London is expecting terrorists attack at the 2012 games? “For now, it looks as if a noble movement has been hijacked by a monster that is plainly out of control”, the writer concludes.
Shockingly, the Rockefeller Foundation in a remarkable narrative has already confirmed the fears of a terrorist attack at the 2012 games dating back 2010. This places the actual incidence in a historic perspective. As far as this piece of research is concerned, the incidence has already been documented. This seems to suggest that those victims who would be going for the Olympic Games, though currently alive, are already dead.
A small portion of the research document titled: Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, (Page 34) published in May 2010by the Rockefeller Foundation, conveyed the following chilling piece of information:
"...The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the ‘doom decade’ for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped Nicaragua and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change. 
Is this prediction simply hypothetical speculation or could this be a warning regarding a terrorist attack that has been planned for the 2012 games? If this critical scenario about such an important event turns out to be true (just as previous scenarios have been), then it means that about 13,000 people including the fasters men on the planet have already been given their death sentence in advance. This to me is something serious for those people to think about.

Cover page: Which Path to Persia? Published by Brookings Institute 2010
The world can still remember related scenarios such as, the “Project for the New American Century”, a report published in the early 2000 as “projections” by key members of the Bush administration. These were the men who had called for a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to facilitate the authoritarian changes we currently see in America: the Patriot Act, Home Land Security, NDAA, among others. In the end, all those projections came into effect, exactly how it was ‘predicted’. Since then, America has never been the same again. Similarly, a document titled: “Which Path to Persia?” a handbook for carrying out regime change across North Africa and the Middle East, was merely written as imaginations or projections. The 156 page report focuses on effecting regime change within Iran, starting with ‘unfriendly’ regimes which include Syria and Lebanon, with Russia and China being the ultimate target. Today, the events in Libya and Syria and Iran cannot be seen as mere coincidences.
‘We can see that the stratagems and methodology defined within this report have played out not only in Iran, but in Libya and Syria as well, with preparations and posturing being made in regards to targets further along China's "String of Pearls" and along Russia's vast borders’, writes Tony Cartalucci, editor of the Land Destroyer’s Report.
Olympics Explosions, BBC Already Has The Shocking Video
Perhaps the most chilling piece of information to emerge regarding the upcoming Olympics is a prediction made by the BBC itself in August 2008, regarding the Olympics and the coming explosions. A BBC's video  documentary, captioned: “Code 9, Predictive Programming”, envisaged a nuclear attack on the London Olympic Stadium. The shocking video  depicts how the terrorist attack at the Olympics would look like. The video begins with the following words:
"In the summer of 2012, an event was to occur that would change the United Kingdom forever", a clear reference to the Olympics Games.
In a vivid narrative, the narrator (the BBC) suggests…
"…In bomb terms the blast was relatively small but the death toll wasn't. Over a 100,000 incinerated (burnt) and many more given a death sentence by a nuclear radiation. For some people outside of the blast zone, life continued almost as normal. But after the attack, nothing in our country would ever be the same again"
Predictive Programming - Attack on London in 2012?

Video: BBC’s Footage Confirms "Big Brother’s" Possible Agenda

Whether or not an attack occurs, we can all be certain of one thing: governments around the world will continue to use the threat of terror to further consolidate their power, and to strip the citizenry of their rights and civil liberties. This agenda was stated at the end of the above video as the media clearly reported, after the supposed incidence:
"...The government has introduced a controversial new security measures, as well as ordering a complete restructure of the security services".
I have a strong conviction that these plots of "terrorist attacks" can be stopped if the people of the world become aware of this piece of information and force those "terrorists" behind the plot to cancel their plans. It will also put responsibility on the security agencies, having received the needed financial support, to prevent this attack from happening at all cost. The world would be better off, if the lives of these 13,000 or over 100,000 men, women and children could be saved from the hands of these terrorists. Everyone must get involve, spread the message and together let us act and prevent this disaster from happening. It is time to join the information campaign.
"May future generations look back on our work and say that these were the men and women who, in a moment of great crisis, stood up to the politicians, the opinion-makers, and the establishment, and saved their country and the world".
-Dr Ron Paul

Thursday, 14 June 2012

Condom: A Psychological Tool For Population Control; Not AIDS

The real motive behind condom is not to fight 
AIDS; it is a population control measure
By Honourable Saka

Are you one of those gullible masses who still believes that AIDS has no cure? Well, here are a few things to think about. 
First of all, Africans and the third world need to wake up and understand that AIDS has been a very big business for the powerful establishment who owns the condom industries. At the same time, AIDS is doing a great job in the globalists’ depopulation agenda: to reduce the population of the third world especially in Africa to the barest minimum.
Meanwhile the notion that AIDS has ‘no cure’ can be discredited by asking ourselves some thought-provoking questions:
  1. Imagine: that the president of the most powerful country in the world, or his only child were to acquire HIV/AIDS by “accident”. Can anybody confidently suggest that those that invented AIDS would watch this powerful man to die of AIDS? Well, I do not think so.
  2. How about the globalist think tanks; the powerful wealthy families: the Rockefellers, the Rothschild, Henry Kissinger, or Bill Gates? Can anybody imagine leading members of the Bilderberg Group ever going to die of AIDS?
  3. What about Her Royal Majesty? Let us assume that the Queen or some key members of the Royal Family were to acquire HIV/AIDS: do you honestly believe that such people would die of AIDS without a cure? Of course not. And I believe you do not expect to hear any of the above developments in the news because of “national security” reasons.
Now, I believe someone has got something to think about. I can say with confidence that AIDS is not a natural disease. Those who created the disease definitely must have the cure in order to ensure their own safety. They created SARS, swine flu (H1N1), and many other dangerous viral diseases. They have recently created another deadly virus (H5N1) for the same purpose in the near future.
It is about time people  realized that AIDS was not made for everybody. AIDS only stands to benefit a few powerful families who believe they own the rest of the world. As long as some few personalities are “immune” from AIDS, it means there is a cure somewhere. Unfortunately, the cure has been deliberately hidden from the world. My instincts tell me that if any of these powerful people were to ever acquire the disease, there will certainly be a cure for them. They would quietly be taken to a secrete private hospital somewhere, where they would be treated. Therefore why can’t there be a cure for the rest of the ordinary people? Why must population control measures always be targeted at the ordinary people but not the political establishment?
For what purpose was AIDS created?
The global elites are concerned that “the world is currently over-populated”. They argue that drastic measures need to be taken in order toreduce the population to the barest minimum.
Depopulation Agenda: Vaccination and Immunization
 As a result: homosexuality, condom use, wars, chemically-induced food products, genetically modified foods, vaccines, strange diseases such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, SARS, H1N1, H5N1, have been some of the effective ways to carry out this agenda. This is the reason why the ‘world leaders’ are not interested in finding a cure for AIDS. They give millions of dollars’ worth of condoms and anti-retro-viral drugs (most of them infested with  virus) to the third world especially Africa, instead of helping them to find a permanent cure. But everybody knows this is not the solution to the problem. 

The so-called vaccination and immunization projects are killing hundreds of thousands instead of fighting the pandemic. It is only a psychological warfare. Currently, there is a shocking revelation which seem to suggests that “Vaccination” and “Immunization” are some of the main channels through which AIDS is currently being spread across Africa.
AIDS-Infected Drugs Banned in U.S, Dumped Overseas
A few years ago, the Rockefeller’s Foundation, (a leading member of the Bilderberg Group) made some so-called 'projections'  on the coming of a more “deadly virus” soon to be unleashed upon the nations of the earth by the end of 2012.
A small portion of the document titled: Scenarios for the Future of Technology and ‘International Development’published in 2010  (Page 18) conveyed the following message:
“…In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years (will) finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new virus- originating from wild geese- is extremely virulent (contagious) and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 per cent of the global population…” Source: The Rockefeller Foundation.

Does this so-called ‘projection’ sound familiar? Remember it was published in 2010. Almost two years later, the news of this man-made virus made the headlines. A report on RT read:

“…A virus with the potential to kill up to half the world’s population has been made in a lab. The virus is an H5N1 bird flu strain which was genetically altered to become much more contagious. It was created by Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, who first presented his work to the public at an influenza conference in Malta in September 2011…”

Of course one day, the media pundits will spin out the official story about this deadly virus out of control and make it sound as if it was not created by scientists.This is exactly how the HIV/AIDS virus was deliberately created!!

So, Why The Condom Deception?
I am not in any doubt about the fact that condom use, is an effective means ofbirth/population control. After all, population control is all the globalists seek to achieve. This is why homosexuality is currently being imposed upon the third world especially in Africa, prompting some African leaders to reject gay aid that comes with string attached .
This is how Bill Gates will reduce world's population in a decade.
At the same time, many birth control policies are being implemented across the third world, led by Bill Gates. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, provides vaccines to third world countries, to promote their massive depopulation agenda.  But, I find it disturbing when the government deliberately deceives the people that condom use is an “effective” means of preventing HIV/AIDS. What makes anybody believes this myth? Is it because the mainstream media or the government says so?
First of all, HIV/AIDS was created as a tool for population control. Most importantly, it has proven to be effective beyond all reasonable doubt in killing millions. Therefore what makes you believe that those powers behind this agenda (population control) would allow condoms to serve as an obstacle to their ultimate goal to use AIDS for population control? The fact is clear: condom, only contributes its part towards population control, by preventing unwanted pregnancies. However, 'Big Brother' will never allow condom to serve as an obstacle to the ultimate agenda which is the population control. AIDS is a very effective tool for the depopulation agenda. If condoms can save people from AIDS, it will be a threat to the agenda of population control. Do you also notice why they promote homosexuality across the world and intend to impose it on Africa? Homosexuals do not produce babies. This means if homosexuality is spread across the world on a mass scale, the human population on earth will diminish drastically within a short period of time. This is their objective.
Meanwhile because of condoms, many married couples can prevent unwanted pregnancies. Young girls in various relationships will use condoms as a means to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Also, the impression people have about condom’s ability to prevent AIDS encourages them to avoid unprotected sex at all cost; making sure all unwanted pregnancies are avoided.  At the same time, buying condoms creates a lot of money for the condom establishment. To them, they have killed two birds with a single stone! This is a sad reality. Condom is a tool for population control, but the powers that be will never allow it to become a protective measure against the most effective tool (AIDS) they already have. The depopulation agenda is the main priority.
Some Basic Analyses
For those of who are still not convinced, let me give you the benefit of the doubt. Are condoms 100% safe? NO. Condoms alone can have up to a 15% fail rate. They are not a very reliable method of contraception. This is why some condoms are rated “extra safe”. Now if some condoms are “extra safe” then, what is the fate of all those whose use he other condoms not rated extra safe? Are they at risk? Well, the fact is whether one uses condoms or not, the most important reality is that condoms are never 100% safe. For the sake of this analysis, let us assume that the usual condom (not the extra safe) is about 98% safe. This gives two scenarios:
First scenario: It means that even if a guy decides to use condoms throughout his life; by the time he uses 100 condoms in total; two of those condoms will fail him. He could therefore acquire HIV/AIDS even though he’s being using condoms all his life.  Mind you it would takes less than 5yrs for one to use 100 condoms or more. That is, if one uses 3 condoms in a month, he would use about 30 condoms per year. Therefore by 4yrs time, he would have used more than 100 condoms. However, even if one of these condoms fails, he could get AIDS. This is the reality. With this understanding, it should be clear that it takes less that 10years in a person’s life to acquire AIDS even if he/she ‘plays safe’.
Second scenario: For those womanizers/prostitutes who go about sleeping with many women/men as necessary, there is also another risk. It means that by the time one sleeps with about 100 different people, he/she could definitely be infected by 2 of the people even if condoms were used. Remember we’re considering the situation where a condom is 98% safe. The more condoms used, the greater the chances of getting the disease. I believe someone now has something to think about.
Therefore the ONLY 100% effective way to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS is a complete abstinence or for people to be strictly faithful to their partners and not to change partners at all. At best, a complete cure for AIDS will be the ultimate solution. Any other scenario like condom use is just a mirage. It can only prevent unwanted pregnancy. As long as population reduction is the rational behind AIDS, condom is there to create a false impression and make the establishment rich at the same time. This is a sad fact.
World Crises: Who Are The Beneficiaries?
Many analysts and independent researchers have concluded that all major crises that exist today are designed to exploit the masses for the benefit of a few tiny elite. From financial crises, economic collapse, strange diseases and what have you. Take a look at World War I and II, the mass population on the planet paid with their lives. Yet in the end, the global elites were the ultimate beneficiaries. They amassed for themselves billions of wealth. More than 80% of the people never wanted war; they wanted to leave in peace. Yet the warlords who sought to benefit, never listened to the cries of humanity. Like today, majority of the world do not want World War III, but a few oil tycoons and military contractors are working tirelessly from behind the scenes to ensure that a war with Syria and Iran that could lead to World War III, will ultimately be inevitable.
Oil barons and military contractors want more wars because higher oil prices means more profits. They care little about human lives. To them, profit is all that matters. Billions of profits were made out of the wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, the Congo, and many other places. Therefore what makes anybody thinks that these business executives, care about those suffering from diseases like AIDS and cancer: the very thing which make them richer every day?
Today, the entire medical industry is a big business. More diseases mean more profit. Any attempt to permanently cure such diseases is a direct threat to their interest. Now you know why someone in the ‘situation room’ is not interested in finding a cure for AIDS and cancer. Instead, they’re rather promoting the use of condoms as a solution to the AIDS pandemic, while others encourage us to buy their chemicals to ‘prevent’ cancer. Must prevention be the ultimate priority? Why is nobody concerned about the need to find the cure instead? It is time the people wake up and fight these corporate interests that have overshadowed the value of human lives.

Honourable SAKA
The author is a regular writer and a political analyst on African affairs, and a well-known social commentator in Africa. He is the editor of “The Doctor’s Report”, your most reliable source of critical analysis on African affairs. He is a strong Pan-Africanist, a youth activist and the founder of the “Leaders of Tomorrow”, a transformational and inspirational group of possible future leaders. Please visit his blog at: and reach him by Email at: